danbri: Comments to www-rdf-rules please.
danbri: See draft for details. Thanks!
sbp: "Jan 2003 - Group Formation" - is that a typo or is this just old? this group should've been chartered back then, though...
danbri: See draft for details. Thanks!
sbp: "Jan 2003 - Group Formation" - is that a typo or is this just old? this group should've been chartered back then, though...
dajobe:
continued from yesterday - Raptor, RIO, 3store, Euler
dajobe: now includes Surnia results
sandro: And now actually including 3store, and with new results from RIO/sesame, and no Surnia runs on things it's not ready for (datatypes).
dajobe: the rdfcore wg has discovered a couple of charmod-literal error test cases are withdrawn, test suite to be updated
dajobe: that is rdf-charmod-literals/error001 and rdf-charmod-literals/error002 will be withdrawn
dajobe: now includes Surnia results
sandro: And now actually including 3store, and with new results from RIO/sesame, and no Surnia runs on things it's not ready for (datatypes).
dajobe: the rdfcore wg has discovered a couple of charmod-literal error test cases are withdrawn, test suite to be updated
dajobe: that is rdf-charmod-literals/error001 and rdf-charmod-literals/error002 will be withdrawn
ericP: quick hack, might be useful
jhendler: Computer Science and Telecommunications Board meeting - IT and Competitiveness, planning meeting
DanC: aka CSTB. chair: Dave Clark
jhendler: worth noting that this isn't the same as him saying it at a public meeting
jhendler: but a step in the right direction
jhendler: but please note - he said this in a context as an individual, not representing IBM official position in any way